Morning Music
The Thermals – A Pillar of Salt
This entry will look a little different than the previous ones because I switched tracking platforms this week. Up until now, I’ve been using Strava, but I’m moving back to TrainingPeaks for Ironman training. It’s what I used the last three times I trained for IMWI. It has more bells and whistles and—if I can figure it out—might even have my old workouts that I can copy forward.
With that change noted, this was a good, solid week where I hit about 90% of the plan. The only thing I missed was a 15-minute run off the bike.
Total planned training time was 7:00, and I finished at 6:41, which I’ll happily take. Fifteen minutes of that gap was the missed brick run, and the rest was just being a few minutes short on swims that were distance-based anyway.
Both swims felt good. Nothing heroic, just steady work and decent rhythm in the water.
Also felt good. Once I get back from Spring Break, I’ll switch back to the road bike. For now I don’t mind using the e-mountain bike because it keeps me solidly in Zone 2, which is exactly where I want to be during base.
This was a nice jump from last week’s 10 miles, and I definitely felt it. Today’s six miler was basically slow miles, slower miles, slowest miles. But it got done, and I immediately followed it with a 2,500-yard swim, which is the kind of back-to-back work that builds durability.
Because of the switch to TrainingPeaks, I don’t have a comparable relative effort score this week. TrainingPeaks uses a different system:
Since I don’t have historical data loaded yet, those numbers don’t mean much on their own. What I really care about is the trend—the week-to-week deltas—not the raw numbers.
Overall, this was a very solid base week. Good volume, most of the workouts completed, and no real signs of overreaching. The runs felt a little heavy, but that’s expected with the mileage bump.
Once I get back from Spring Break, the plan is simple:
Base Phase Week 4: steady progress.
Raised by Wolves – The Interrupters (I’ve had this album has been on repeat for weeks now)
Not that anybody asked, but…
I would like to see the NHL go to a 3-2-1 point system for games. Three points for a win, 2 points for an OT/Shootout win, 1 point for an OT/Shootout loss.
What I’d really like is three points for a regulation win, 2 points for an OT win, 1 point for an OT loss, and no points for a shootout loss. I know this seems to hurt teams who are tied and go into a shootout, but I don’t want shootouts. Period. It’s like settling a hockey game by playing a different game. I don’t like the current strategy of passively maintaining possession in OT. There is no value in winning in OT as opposed to the shootout. I want them to play to win in OT. This plan might allow them to take chances in OT because if the chance backfires, they still get a point. There is no reward for playing it safe.
What I’d really like is no shootouts, period. Just play 3-on-3 until there is a goal. Still give 3 for a win, 2 for the OT win, and 1 for the OT loss. That’s my preferred solution.
I’d also love to get rid of icing except for the last 5 minutes of a period. I get how the rule prevents teams from stalling by shooting it down the ice. They are penalized with a defensive zone face-off. BUT, it slows down the game. I don’t like stoppages of play. It really drives me nuts when it’s icing by accident. Someone throws a bad breakout pass….boom, icing. They aren’t trying to stall. They aren’t trying it as a defensive maneuver. I’m sure one could think of ways teams would exploit this, but I think I’d rather have that than stopping play every 2 minutes.
—- in case you care, this is what AI said:
Eliminating the icing rule for the majority of a game would fundamentally shift the tactical landscape of hockey. It would turn a game defined by controlled zone entries and puck support into one defined by verticality and “home run” passes.
Here is a breakdown of the potential pros and cons of limiting icing calls to the final five minutes of each period.
Increased Scoring Opportunities: Defenders under pressure would no longer have the “safety valve” of icing the puck. Instead of a whistle and a faceoff, a panicked clear becomes a live puck that an opportunistic forechecker can intercept in the neutral zone.
Continuous Flow: The number of whistles would drop significantly. This would increase the “effective” playing time and prevent the game from stalling, which often happens when a tired defensive unit repeatedly ices the puck to catch their breath.
Reward for Speed: Teams with elite skating wingers could utilize the “stretch pass” more effectively. If you can beat the opposing defense to a puck dumped from behind your own red line, you create immediate breakaways or odd-man rushes.
Enhanced Conditioning Stakes: Without the ability to force a whistle, defensive pairs would be forced to play through exhaustion. This creates a “survival of the fittest” dynamic where late-shift mistakes become more common and punishable.
The “Boring” Trap: Ironically, while it could lead to more goals, it could also make the game less interesting to watch. Teams might default to “flip-and-chase” hockey, bypass the neutral zone entirely, and eliminate the intricate cross-ice passing and puck-handling that fans enjoy.
Player Safety: Icing exists partly to prevent dangerous races to the end boards. Even with “hybrid icing” rules, removing the restriction for 45 minutes of the game would encourage high-speed collisions as players sprint full-tilt toward the boards to negate or retrieve a loose puck.
Defensive Stalling: While the rule is meant to stop “cheap” clears, it might encourage a different kind of negative play. A leading team could simply fire the puck 200 feet away every time they touch it, forcing the trailing team to skate back, retrieve it, and start over—killing 15–20 seconds of clock per clear.
Late-Game Inconsistency: Switching the rules for the final five minutes creates a “different game” at the most critical juncture. Players who have spent 15 minutes playing a vertical, “long-ball” style would suddenly have to pivot back to traditional discipline, likely leading to a spike in accidental icing infractions during the most intense part of the period.
| Feature | Without Icing (0:00–15:00) | With Icing (15:00–20:00) |
| Pace | High-speed, chaotic, vertical. | Controlled, tactical, set-plays. |
| Strategy | Long-distance stretch passes. | Short-support and puck possession. |
| Whistles | Minimal; mostly for goals/penalties. | Frequent; used to manage defensive pressure. |
Korean TV Shows: (all on Netflix)
Because This is My First Life – Admittedly, I’m on a Jung So-min kick.
Love Next Door – See above
Alchemy of Souls – (only four episodes in) – See above and below
Resident Playbook – Okay, I’m also sort of on a Go Youn-jung kick.
Can This Love be Translated – again, see above.
High Society
Music:
Pink Floyd – Live at Pompeii
Pkew Pkew Pkew
Loviet
Books:
Red Rising – Pierce Brown
I See You’ve Called in Dead – John Kenney
Do No Harm – Henry Marsh
Head Cases (#1) and Inside Man (Head Cases #2) – John McMahon
Unreasonable Hospitality – Will Guidara
Food:
Poco Bero – Pizza dough balls. I fell for the Instagram ads (but bought via Amazon). These are great. Plop one to defrost in a bowl, stretch, and cook. They are easy and make great pizzas. Big fan.
E-Bikes
Magnum Peak T7 – Really enjoying mine for commutes to work, also like it on trails in Utah. Solid bike.
Today is my parents’ wedding anniversary.
They won’t be celebrating because they are dead.
That sentence sounds harsher than it needs to, but it’s the truth. My mom died about six years ago and my dad followed about a year and a half later. Time keeps moving, even when the people who helped start it for you are gone.
When they passed, I have to admit I didn’t feel as much as I expected to. That probably sounds cold. It wasn’t that I didn’t love them. They were terrific parents. I had a great childhood. They supported me through college and well beyond. If there was a “Parents Hall of Fame,” they’d at least make the regional ballot.
But like most children, I had my issues with them. And when they died, life was complicated.
My mom’s death was sudden. She collapsed at choir practice and that was it. One moment singing, the next moment gone.
My dad’s passing was the opposite. He had a disease that slowly wasted him for years. By the end, he couldn’t really hold a conversation for the last two years or more of his life.
When my mom died, I became the primary person helping with my dad. My sibling lives out of town and was wonderful, but the day-to-day stuff fell mostly to me simply because I was nearby.
So I didn’t really grieve my mom. Fifty percent of that is just my personality—I’m not the most outwardly emotional guy. The other fifty percent was that I was busy dealing with my dad.
And when my dad died, I didn’t grieve much then either. He had been sick for over a decade, and by the end his death felt like the end of suffering. Honestly, since he hadn’t been able to talk for years, it sometimes felt like he had been gone long before the official date on the death certificate.
But time does strange things.
Now, years later, I find myself deeply affected by their absence.
Part of that is probably because I’m going through the stage of life where you worry about your own kids. Mine are all doing fine—better than fine, actually—but that doesn’t stop my brain from inventing scenarios at 2 a.m.
And lately I’ve realized I would give just about anything to sit down with my parents for an hour.
I’d ask them questions.
How did you deal with me when I was screwing things up?
Did you worry about me the way I worry about my kids?
How did you keep it together when you had no idea how things would turn out?
I’m a lot like my dad when it comes to worrying, anxiety, and a general desire to control outcomes that are, in reality, completely uncontrollable. His behavior used to drive me nuts when I was growing up.
Now I find I’m basically his twin.
That happens.
What makes it harder is that I see some of the same tendencies in one of my kids, and I would give anything for him not to be that way. It’s a miserable way to live—always scanning the horizon for problems that may never come.
A few months ago, when I was struggling a bit, I did something I never thought I’d do. I went to their graves.
Not for any mystical reason. I didn’t expect answers. I’m fairly certain cemeteries have terrible customer service when it comes to responding to questions.
But it was meditative.
They didn’t answer anything, of course. And I realized something while I was there: nobody ever will. Friends can tell me how they handled their kids, but nobody can tell me how my parents handled me.
That knowledge went with them.
Which leaves me with the only thing I can actually do: be mindful of the time I have with my own children.
My parents’ time with me ended sooner than I ever imagined. Mine with my kids will too.
So today, on their anniversary, I’ll probably call my sister like I usually do. In the past, I’d say, “Hey, thinking about Mom and Dad today,” even though if I’m being honest, I probably hadn’t been until that moment.
It was the polite thing to say.
This year it won’t be polite.
It will be true.
I think about them most days now.
And if they were still here, I’d probably spend that hour asking them questions… and then another hour thanking them for putting up with me. I was a decent son, but I couldv’e been so much better. You’re right, Mom, it wouldn’t kill me to call once in a while.
Now that I have kids of my own, I realize something important:
They deserved a medal and, sadly, I feel very guilty that I wasn’t a better son (again, I was fine, but now that my own kids treat me the way I treated them, I feel terrible. If I made them feel like my kids make me feel? Sheesh…although, that’s what kids finding their independence/way do and so maybe I don’t wish it was different…but really, would it kill them to call or text once in awhile?”